Legal Opinion
Long Beach Ass'n v. Jones
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1998No. 97-714PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
The question presented for resolution is whether the wording in the 1927 plat of Block' B is ambiguous or clear, and if clear, whether the plat limits use of the lagoon to residents of Block B or allows use to residents of Blocks A, B, and C of the Long Beach subdivision.
Our analysis causes us to conclude that the wording in the plat is clear in stating that all residents of the Long Beach subdivision have use of the lagoon, which, includes the residents of Blocks A, B, and C. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by99 opinions
- Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Daniel E. Terreri & Sons, Inc. v. Mahoning County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- French-Tex Cleaners, Inc. v. Cafaro Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- American Energy Corp. v. DatkuliakOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hanna v. Groom, 07ap-502 (2-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.