Legal Opinion

Pillsbury v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1937No. L. A. 16072PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSitenk, J.

This is an application for the writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent superior court from entertaining jurisdiction to hear evidence and determine issues raised by an amended complaint filed by its permission after repeal from and reversal of a portion of the judgment in the action.

In 1933 the petitioner, Louise Pillsbury, filed an action for divorce against William Pillsbury. She also sought a division of the community property. The alleged community property consisted of three pieces of real property conveyed in August of that year to William Pillsbury by Laura Belle Resh in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Lial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Keller v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. American Enterprise, Inc. v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API