Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Company v. Moseley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1984No. 13308, 13432PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In Continental Ins. Co. v. Moseley, 98 Nev. 476, 653 P.2d 158 (1982), this court affirmed two district court orders. In No. 13432, the district court had denied appellant’s motion to substitute the executrix of the decedent’s estate for the decedent, on the ground that the motion to substitute was not timely filed. In No. 13308, the district court had denied appellant’s motion to compel republication to creditors and had declared appellant’s claim forever barred.

The United States Supreme Court granted appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court vacated this, court’s…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Continental Insurance v. MoseleyNevada Supreme Court · 1982

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Palazzi v. Estate of GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Estate of Busch v. Ferrell-Duncan Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API