Legal Opinion
Palazzi v. Estate of Gardner
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 1987No. 86-1265PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The instant appeal calls into question the constitutionality of the notice provisions governing Ohio probate proceedings. Probate of a will in Ohio involves a bifurcated process. R.C. Chapter 2107 governs, among other things, the execution and probate of wills within the state. R.C. 2107.13 prescribes the procedure by which notice of the probate proceeding is to be given to interested parties. It provides:
“No will shall be admitted to probate without notice to the surviving spouse known to the applicant, and to the persons known to the applicant to be residents of the state who would be…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- City of North Canton v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GreviousOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. LordiOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.