Legal Opinion
Jacob Scoggins v. Lee's Crossing Homeowners Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2013No. 11-2202, 11-2373PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded by published opinion. Judge KEENAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge MOTZ joined.
OPINION
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we consider the district court’s summary judgment holding that the plaintiffs, Dan Scoggins, Debbie Scog-gins, and their son Jacob Scoggins (collectively, the plaintiffs), were not entitled under the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 through 3631 (the FHAA), to an accommodation and a modification that they requested from the Lee’s Crossing Homeowners Association (the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State of South Carolina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Logan v. MatveevskiiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chevron Corporation v. Aaron PageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Pamela Whitaker v. Monroe Staffing Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Summers v. City of FitchburgCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.