Legal Opinion
Logan v. Matveevskii
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 29, 2014No. Case No. 10-CV-9247 (KMK)PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:
Plaintiff Thomas Logan (“Logan”), proceeding pro se, brings this Action against Defendants Irina Matveevskii (“Mat-veevskii”), Jeff Zuckerman (“Zucker-man”), Mark Kamensky (“Kamensky”), Tuckahoe Housing Authority (“THA”), Adolfo Carrión (“Carrión”), and Mirza Or-riols (“Orriols”).1 Matveevskii, Zucker-man, Kamensky, and THA (collectively, “the THA Defendants”) move for summary judgment, while Carrión and Morales (collectively, “the HUD Defendants”) move to dismiss the claims asserted *238against them. For the following reasons, the THA Defendants’…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Wright v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Austin v. Town of FarmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Clark v. Jewish Childcare Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Peninsula Regional Medical Center v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Novick v. Vill. of Wappingers FallsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Regnante v. Securities & Exchange OfficialsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.