Legal Opinion

Foste v. Standard Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Multnomah : Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Action by H. D. Foste against the Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company, of Detroit, Michigan, to recover certain money. Defendant appeals from a judgment for the amount demanded.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is an action to recover money alleged to be due on account of insurance secured by plaintiff for the defendant. This action was here on a former appeal, and, the judgment having been reversed (Foste v. Standard Insurance Co. 26 Or. 449, 38 Pac. 617), the cause was remanded; whereupon plaintiff, by leave of court, amended his complaint, the material parts of which are as follows: “That heretofore, to wit, during the years 1891 and 1892, the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, performed for defendant labor and service? as a special agent to solicit accident and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Foste v. Standard InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Houghton & Palmer v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Weiner v. Lee ShingOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Bingham v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Patterson v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lindstrom v. National Life Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Skelton v. NewbergOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Rosebraugh v. TigardOregon Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API