Legal Opinion

Weiner v. Lee Shing

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for the plaintiff, rendered in an action to recover money. The action was tried by a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the respondent for the sum of $1,000, the amount claimed to be due. Among the questions raised upon the appeal is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The following is the substance of the complaint: —

“ That Lee Shing and Lee Shing Tin are, and during all the times herein mentioned were partners, doing business at Portland, Oregon, under the style and firm name of ‘ Q,uon Wo On/ and that during…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hannan v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Wyatt v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Kimball v. RedfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API