Rosebraugh v. Tigard
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BEAN, J. —
There can be no contention in regard to the law in this state that in an action at law tried by the court without a jury, the findings of fact made by the trial court have the same force and effect as the verdict of a jury. Therefore, in regard to the facts found in this case, we have only to inquire if there is any substantial evidence to support such finding’s. We are not concerned with any conflict in the testimony.
The Circuit Court found, among’ other facts, in substance as follows:
That on the twenty-eighth day of April, 1919, in consideration of plaintiff having become a member…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Arnold v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Hardwick v. State InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Portland v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Stringham v. Mutual Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buck v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- American Ins. Co. of Texas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Geddes v. Oregon Grange Fire Relief Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Capital Credit & Collection Serv., Inc. v. Kerr Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Charles v. All Nation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.