Munger v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
The issue before us is whether the offense of first-degree burglary, which requires nonconsensual entry into a building with intent to commit a crime, requires that the intent must be to commit a crime within the building. Respondent Rickford Rehmann Munger was convicted of first-degree burglary following a guilty plea in Olmsted County. He subsequently petitioned to vacate his guilty plea, arguing that the plea was invalid because the factual basis did not establish an intent to commit a crime within the building. The district court denied the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. LogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. RauschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.