Legal Opinion

Munger v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 2008No. A06-1563PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The issue before us is whether the offense of first-degree burglary, which requires nonconsensual entry into a building with intent to commit a crime, requires that the intent must be to commit a crime within the building. Respondent Rickford Rehmann Munger was convicted of first-degree burglary following a guilty plea in Olmsted County. He subsequently petitioned to vacate his guilty plea, arguing that the plea was invalid because the factual basis did not establish an intent to commit a crime within the building. The district court denied the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. TheisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. State v. LogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Roby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State v. RauschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API