Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
In 2007, Lane Francis Weitzel pleaded guilty to one count of failure to register as a predatory offender. In 2014, he filed a petition for postconviction relief in which he seeks to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that it is inaccurate because it lacks an adequate factual basis. In its answer to the petition, the state opposed postconviction relief on the merits, without addressing whether the petition is timely. The postconviction court nonetheless denied the petition on the grounds that it is untimely and that Weitzel did not satisfy the interests-of-justice…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Acosta v. ArtuzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. OsborneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016