State v. Colvin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
This appeal presents the question of whether a criminal defendant’s violation of an order for protection (OFP) is sufficient to establish first-degree burglary, absent the commission of or intent to commit a crime other than a violation of the order for protection.
Peter Allen Colvin (Colvin) was charged by complaint with one count of first-degree burglary. The charge arose from Colvin’s February 25, 1999, illegal entry into the home of his ex-wife, Michelle Colvin. Colvin moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that the violation of an OFP could not form the basis of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. SotoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.