Legal Opinion

State v. Rausch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 2011No. A11-1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

The state appeals the district court’s downward departure from the statutory mandate that a person convicted of burgla*21ry of an occupied dwelling must be committed to the commissioner of corrections or county workhouse for not less than six months, arguing that the district court lacks authority to depart downward from the mandatory sentence. We conclude that the district court erred by failing to impose the mandatory-minimum sentence for burglary of an occupied dwelling and reverse.

FACTS

Following a dispute with her ex-boyfriend outside the ex-boyfriend’s home,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Munger v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Jagger CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API