Legal Opinion

State v. Dow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 25, 1957No. 149PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Our Constitution provides: “No person shall be-convicted of any crime but by the unanimous verdict of good and lawful persons in open court.” Art. I, sec. 13.

When requested in apt time, a party is entitled to have the jury polled; that is, an inquiry directed to each juror in order to ascertain his assent to the announced verdict. When so polled and the verdict is challenged, the record must affirmatively establish that each juror assented to the verdict entered. S. v. Cephus, 241 N.C. 562, 86 S.E. 2d 70; S. v. Boger, 202 N.C. 702, 163 S.E. 877; Oil Co. v. Moore, 202 N.C. 708, 163 S.E. 879;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CephusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Lipscomb v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Columbus Oil Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  4. State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API