Legal Opinion

Columbus Oil Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

In Lipscomb v. Cox, 195 N. C., 502, 142 S. E., 779, it is said: “The right of either party to poll the jury in both criminal and civil actions is firmly established by the decisions in this State. The predominant purpose of the poll is to ascertain if the verdict as tendered by the jury is the ‘unanimous verdict of a jury of good and lawful men in open court’ as prescribed by the Constitution, Art. I, sec. 13, for criminal causes. One of the first cases dealing with the subject is S. v. Young, 77 N. C., 498. The Court held: ‘When the verdict has been received from the foreman and entered, it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. McCabe Lumber Co. v. Beaufort County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State Ex. Rel. Petty v. RousseauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Trantham v. Elk Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Lipscomb v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FinneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. State v. DowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Livingston v. . LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY, ETC. v. PrivettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API