Porth v. Glasoe
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
Helen L. Porth appeals from a county court judgment dismissing her action for fraud against Curtis W. Glasoe. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Porth’s motion for a change of venue and the court’s finding of no fraud is not clearly erroneous. We affirm.
I
Porth owns property next to land farmed by Curtis’s brother, Arthur Glasoe, in Divide County near Ambrose. A dispute arose over the location of the boundary line between the land. Curtis, a licensed land surveyor, agreed to help resolve the dispute by surveying the boundary. The parties disagree…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Mitchell v. PreusseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Gross v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- GeoStar Corp. v. Parkway Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wheeler v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Endresen v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Linstrom v. NormileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.