Legal Opinion

Porth v. Glasoe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1994No. Civ. 940081PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Helen L. Porth appeals from a county court judgment dismissing her action for fraud against Curtis W. Glasoe. We hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Porth’s motion for a change of venue and the court’s finding of no fraud is not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

Porth owns property next to land farmed by Curtis’s brother, Arthur Glasoe, in Divide County near Ambrose. A dispute arose over the location of the boundary line between the land. Curtis, a licensed land surveyor, agreed to help resolve the dispute by surveying the boundary. The parties disagree…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Williams v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. PreusseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gross v. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. GeoStar Corp. v. Parkway Petroleum, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Endresen v. Scheels Hardware & Sports Shop, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Estate of DionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Flattum-Riemers v. Flattum-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Linstrom v. NormileNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API