Legal Opinion
Harris v. Missouri Department of Conservation
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1988No. WD 39941PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
This is a case for damages for inverse condemnation. It comes on for appeal following the granting of the dismissal of plaintiff’s petition for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiff is trustee for a trust which owns a 888 acre tract of land which (totally) encompasses a 230 acre lake. The petition alleges that in May, 1983, “Plaintiff notified the Missouri Department of Conservation of its intent to commercially fish the property and to seek Defendant’s assistance and knowledge in undertaking the same. However, Defendant, without a hearing or right to appear,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Clay County Ex Rel. County Commission of Clay v. Harley & Susie Bogue, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. City of BridgetonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Miller v. City of WentzvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Glenn v. City of Grant CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.