Legal Opinion
Hyzer v. Cigna Property Casualty Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 11, 1995No. 1:95-cv-10023PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
CLELAND, District Judge.
I. Background
This matter is before the court upon the court’s own order to show cause why the case should not be remanded entered April 13, 1995. This case was commenced by the plaintiffs in Tuscola County District Court (Anthony Koroleski) and Huron County Circuit Court (Steven Koroleski and Ronald Hyzer). The plaintiffs sought benefits due under crop insurance policies issued by the defendants and which were reinsured by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (“FCIC”). Defendants…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Amsouth Bank (03-5517) First Tennessee Bank (03-5521) v. George DaleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Bullard v. Southwest Crop Ins. Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Horn v. Rural Community Insurance ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1995
- Thigpen v. Cheminova, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1997
- Bullinger v. TrebasDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.