Legal Opinion
Thigpen v. Cheminova, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided August 28, 1997No. Civ.A. 1:97CV50GRPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GEX, District Judge.
This cause is before on the plaintiffs’ amended motion to remand this case to state court [24-1]. After due consideration of the evidence of record, the briefs of counsel, the applicable law, and otherwise being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds, as set forth below, that the plaintiffs’ motion should be granted.
Legal Analysis
The defendants invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 and 1441(b), the provisions for federal question, diversity, and removal jurisdiction. 1 “Federal courts are courts…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mueller v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Matter of Zale Corporation, Debtor. Alan D. Feld, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Zale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Jernigan v. Ashland Oil Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ell v. S.E.T. Landscape Design, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Ott v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2002
- Hart v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Rodalton Hart v. Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.