Legal Opinion

Bullinger v. Trebas

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 30, 2003No. A4-02-13PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

The plaintiffs, Daniel Bullinger and David Bullinger [hereinafter referred to as the Bullingers], and defendant Brad Tre-bas, are residents of Bottineau County, North Dakota. Defendant Rain and Hail, L.L.C. [hereinafter referred to as Rain & Had], is an insurance company licensed to do business in North Dakota.

On or before March 15, 1999, the Bul-lingers completed applications for multi-peril crop insurance with the assistance of Brad Trebas, a local agent for Rain & Hail. The policies were issued by Rain & Hail and reinsured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Gaming Corporation of America Golden Nickel Casinos, Inc. v. Dorsey & Whitney, a Partnership, in Re Dorsey & Whitney, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Gore v. Trans World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skymont Farms v. NorthDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
  2. Buchholz v. Rural Community InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Wanamaker v. LawsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
  4. Plants, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API