Legal Opinion

Amburgy v. Golden

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 29, 1976No. 4088-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarris, J.

This action was initiated by Samuel and Sharon Amburgy to recover for injuries to her resulting from a fall over a 2-foot retaining wall in an apartment complex owned by Dan Golden and Max Kessler. The trial court granted Golden and Kessler’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the Amburgys’ case. The Amburgys appeal.

Sharon Amburgy was injured when she stepped off the edge of a retaining wall while walking after dark between her brother-in-law’s apartment and a neighboring apartment; she was not following a prepared pathway. The record fails to establish that anyone else ever took…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shelby v. KeckWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McCutcheon v. United Homes Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Regan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Geise v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Frasch v. LeedomWashington Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charlton v. Day Island Marina, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. Griffin v. West RS, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Kimball v. MilletCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Johnson v. BlackburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rodriguez v. WinikerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API