Kimball v. Millet

We accepted discretionary review, on the application of Earl and Vina Mae Millet, of an order denying their motion for summary judgment of dismissal of this action, brought against them by Clayton Kimball for personal injuries caused by an aggressive bull. The bull was owned by a farming corporation that employed both Kim-ball and the Millets. The injuries were sustained on farmland owned by the Millets, but leased to the corporation. It is undisputed that Kimball was injured in the course of his employment, that the Millets, as corporate officers, were Kimball's coemployees, and that the…