Legal Opinion

Griffin v. West RS, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 4, 1999No. 41904-8-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

At issue in this case of first impression is whether a special relationship creating a duty may exist between a residential landlord and its tenant. Assuming such a relationship exists, we must also decide the nature of the duty owed by the landlord to protect its tenant against foreseeable criminal conduct on the premises. We hold that West RS, Inc., d/b/a Trammell Crow Residential Services had a duty to protect Christie Griffin, its tenant, from foreseeable criminal conduct of another tenant. The trial court’s refusal to so instruct the jury was prejudicial error. We reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. South v. McCarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Griffin v. West RS, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Boeing Co. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Boeing Co. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Keller v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API