Rodriguez v. Winiker
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtRipps, J.
The defendant-landowner appeals pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R.A.D.A., Rule 8C(1) whether the evidence was sufficient for the judge to find him negligent for not having a fence atop a retaining wall from which the five-year-old plaintiff fell; (2) whether the judge failed to consider the plaintiffs comparative negligence; and (3) whether the judgment was excessive.
The defendant is the trustee of CS Realty Trust which purchased 38-42 Catherine Street, Worcester, in November, 1997. A paved driveway runs between 38-42 Catherine Street and the adjoining 36 Catherine Street. A concrete retaining…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Davis v. Westwood GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Lisa Jorgensen v. Massachusetts Port Authority, Appeal of Donald Hertzfeldt and Peter LangleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bottone v. DeFreitasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
- Day v. HymanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007