Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Winiker

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 3, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRipps, J.

The defendant-landowner appeals pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R.A.D.A., Rule 8C(1) whether the evidence was sufficient for the judge to find him negligent for not having a fence atop a retaining wall from which the five-year-old plaintiff fell; (2) whether the judge failed to consider the plaintiffs comparative negligence; and (3) whether the judgment was excessive.

The defendant is the trustee of CS Realty Trust which purchased 38-42 Catherine Street, Worcester, in November, 1997. A paved driveway runs between 38-42 Catherine Street and the adjoining 36 Catherine Street. A concrete retaining…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. O'Sullivan v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Davis v. Westwood GroupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Lisa Jorgensen v. Massachusetts Port Authority, Appeal of Donald Hertzfeldt and Peter LangleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bottone v. DeFreitasMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
  2. Day v. HymanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API