Legal Opinion

City of Elizabeth v. Windsor-Fifth Avenue

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 16, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 187 (1954)

106 A.2d 9

CITY OF ELIZABETH AND HENRY EINHORN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

WINDSOR-FIFTH AVENUE, INC., (TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON), ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. CITY OF ELIZABETH AND ALBERT HERTZBERG, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

WINDSOR-FIFTH AVENUE, INC., (TWO GUYS FROM HARRISON), ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 24, 1954.

Decided June 16, 1954.

Before Judges CLAPP, SMALLEY and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Raymond A. Leahy argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Mr. Murray G. Simon argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan BoroughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. State v. Mundet Cork Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  5. City of Mt. Vernon v. JulianIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Dock Watch Hollow Quarry Pit v. Tp. of WarrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Sarner v. Union Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Hertz Washmobile System v. South OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Town of West Orange v. Jordan Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API