Legal Opinion

Fred v. Mayor and Council, Old Tappan Borough

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1952PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion- of the court was delivered by

Vanderbilt, C. J.

The plaintiff landowners instituted this action in the Law Division of the Superior Court to test the validity of an ordinance of the defendant borough regulating the removal-of soil from lands within its confines. Erom the judgment of that court sustaining the ordinance the plaintiffs took an appeal to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court which we have certified here on' our own motion.

Two questions are presented on this appeal: does a municipality have the authority to enact an ordinance regulating the removal of soil, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Pope v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Inganamort v. Bor. of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. Varsolona v. Breen Capital Services Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API