Legal Opinion

City of Mt. Vernon v. Julian

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1938No. 24610. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shaw

This is an action against the appellant, Harry Julian, for violation of a city ordinance. He was assessed a fine of $5 by the police magistrate, and, on appeal, the circuit court sustained the judgment. The validity of an ordinance being directly involved, the trial court so certified, and stated that the public interest required a direct appeal to this court.

Appellant operated a community grocery store in Mt. Vernon, and kept for sale groceries, bread, milk, vegetables, tobacco, cigarettes, cigars and other articles usually kept for sale in a community grocery store. He kept his place of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Hawthorn v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Eden v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Braceville Coal Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. People v. ShephardIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Two Guys From Harrison, Inc. v. FurmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Opyt's Amoco, Inc. v. Village of South HollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API