Legal Opinion

Security Commercial v. Imperial Water Co. No. 1

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1920No. L. A. No. 5665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

A rehearing from the district court of appeal was ordered in this cause for the purpose of correcting the form of the judgment of reversal so as to eliminate the direction to enter judgment in favor of the defendants Harris and Ferris. With the exception of the judgment we adopt the opinion of the district court of appeal as the opinion of this court, with the additions hereinafter stated. That opinion is as follows:

“The appeal here is on the judgment-roll alone. The facts were stipulated, and as so agreed to were by the court found to be true. . So far as material here, the facts stipulated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Estate of Thomas v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hall v. CayotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sherman v. S. K. D. Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ahern v. Tulare Lake Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Palo Verde Land & Water Co. v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Clark v. Western Feeding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API