Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Reynolds
California Supreme Court
Decided September 21, 1960No. S. F. 20194; S. F. 20195PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From judgments in favor of plaintiffs in two actions seeking to compel the issuance of new stock certificates to them, after trial before the court without a jury, the corporation defendants appeal.
Facts: August 23,1957, plaintiff Charlotte Reynolds brought a divorce action against her husband, Robert Reynolds, in the Superior Court in and for the City and County of San Francisco.
Mr. Reynolds had left California on or about August 14, 1957. Mrs. Reynolds obtained an order for publication of summons, which also provided that personal service of the complaint and summons might be made outside…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Noble v. BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frye v. Commonwealth Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Geertz v. AusonioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jeng-Cheng Ho v. Shih-Ming HsiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Board of Retirement v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Rony v. Yucca Water Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.