Legal Opinion

District 1199P Health & Welfare Plan v. Janssen, L.P.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 21, 2011No. Civil Action 10-2021 (FLW)PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a motion filed by Defendants, Janssen, L.P. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Defendants”), 1 to dismiss all counts (I-X) of the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). This putative class action involves Risperdal, a prescription medication currently marketed and sold by Defendants for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, and autistic disorder. Plaintiffs, District 1199P Health and Welfare Plan, Ironworkers Local Union No. 399 and Participating Employers Health and Welfare…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Kaul v. ChristieDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
  2. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  3. Citizens United Reciprocal Exch. v. MeerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  4. In re EpipenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API