Legal Opinion
Kaul v. Christie
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 25, 2019No. Civ. No. 16-2364 (KM) (SCM)PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200)
KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients without proper training and experience constituted gross and repeated malpractice, negligence, and incompetence, the Board revoked his medical license. From Dr. Kaul's perspective, the disciplinary proceedings were nothing but a sham. What really happened, he says, is…
2Cases cited127 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- ABADI v. MARINA DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Anand v. Independence Blue CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BATISTA v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BEGUM v. MICHAEL HARRISONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BREAKWATER TREATMENT AND WELLNESS CORP. v. THE CITY OF ASBURY PARKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.