Legal Opinion

Haynes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1983No. 45654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

A jury found movant guilty of two counts of robbery first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon, a shotgun. The trial court sentenced movant on both counts to twenty-two (22) years in prison. The sentences are to run concurrently. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal and reported at 573 S.W.2d 68 (Mo.App.1978).

Movant filed this Rule 27.26 motion alleging he was denied effective assistance of counsel and was prejudiced by the trial judge’s comments. The hearing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. SykesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Kelly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Lane v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Follins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Greene v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Horsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API