Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1987No. 52166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

A jury found movant guilty of robbery in the first degree in violation of RSMo § 569.020 (1978). Defendant was sentenced to seventeen years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. State v. Johnson, 676 S.W.2d 257 (Mo.App., E.D.1984).

Defendant filed this Rule 27.26 motion alleging he was denied effective assistance of counsel. To uphold a 27.26 motion, defendant must prove trial counsel’s performance did not conform to the degree of care and skill of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Futrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Franklin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Mercer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Pool v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. McIntyre v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API