Horsey v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
An information charged movant Charles Arthur Horsey committed six counts of receiving stolen property. A jury found him guilty of each count. In accordance with the verdicts he was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years upon each count. It was adjudged the sentences would run consecutively. The judgment was affirmed upon direct appeal. State v. Horsey, 676 S.W.2d 847 (Mo.App.1984).
In this proceeding the movant seeks to set aside that judgment by his motion under Rule 27.26. The motion court denied that motion without a hearing. On appeal from that denial the movant states one…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. LibertySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. GaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. MarkhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.