Lane v. State

TITUS, Judge.

In 1974 movant, then defendant, was jury-convicted of armed robbery in the first *46degree. §§ 560.120 and 560.135 RSMo 1969. Having determined, as charged, that mov-ant was subject to the habitual criminal statute, § 556.280 RSMo 1969, the court sentenced him to a 12 year term of imprisonment. The circuit court appointed counsel for movant relative to his subsequently filed motion under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. This appeal follows denial, without eviden-tiary hearing, of movant’s pro se unamended motion. Paragraphs 8 and 9 of the motion are fully repeated in part I of the Addendum to…