Legal Opinion

Follins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1991No. 58868Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Movant appeals denial of a Rule 27.26 [withdrawn in 1988] motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. This court affirmed movant’s conviction of capital murder in State v. Follins, 672 S.W.2d 167 (Mo.App.1984). Movant presents two allegations of error. We affirm.

First, movant claims the motion court erred because in alleging that the trial court expressed bias against movant in full view of the jury, movant has alleged facts which, if proven true, would entitle him to relief. A claim of trial court bias is an issue cognizable on direct appeal but not in a Rule 27.26…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wesson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Haynes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. FollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API