Dennison v. Connecticut Good Humor, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The finding, as corrected in the Superior Court, is summarized by the trial judge as follows: The named defendant is engaged in the business of selling a commodity known as “Good Humors,” which are made of ice cream attached to sticks. These are sold by young men whom it employs, stationed at various points along the highways. The “Good Humors” are carried in containers and the young salesmen are known as container boys. On June 20, 1941, the plaintiff, a lad of eighteen years, entered the defendant’s employ as a container boy and was instructed in the technique of the company’s style of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Bullard v. Cullman Heading Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Garriepy v. Ballou & Nagle, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Davis v. Goldie Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Carpentino v. Transport InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000