Legal Opinion
Garriepy v. Ballou & Nagle, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 15, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.
Prom the evidence presented the jury could reasonably have found that the defendant Ballou & Nagle, Inc., was located in Southington and engaged in the trucking business; that one of the trucks operated by the company was a Mack Bulldog truck and the defendant Weady, one of the company’s drivers, had left New York City the morning of April 17th, 1930, with this truck, stopped in New Haven to make some deliveries, telephoned to the home office for instructions and was told to go to Wallingford and get a load of steel. Pursuant to these instructions he proceeded up State Street in New Haven,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Stone v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1877
- Loomis v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Butler v. Hyperion Theatre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. ReddickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Shiembob v. RinglingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Cole v. Johnson Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Martinelli v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Cadwell v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.