Legal Opinion

Judge Technical Services, Inc. v. Clancy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 2002PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

¶ 1 Appellants, Thomas Clancy (“Clancy”), Lawrence J. Senko (“Senko”), Brett Pinto (“Pinto”), and Alliance Consulting Group, Inc. (“Alliance”), ask us to review the order and judgment of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, which entered default judgment and awarded damages in favor of Appellees, Judge Technical Services, Inc. (“JTS”) and Judge Inc., (“Judge”). Specifically, Clancy, Sen-ko, Pinto, and Alliance challenge the court’s entry of default judgment. They further assail the court’s calculation of compensatory damages and its award of punitive damages. Finally, Clancy, Senko,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Shiner v. MoriartySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Omicron Systems, Inc. v. WeinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Robert Golden, Attorney-In-Fact for Leah Golden Donald Earwood, of the Estate of Helen Earwood v. David S. Golden Darlene KoposkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API