Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This appeal presents us with the opportunity to determine whether punitive damages must bear a reasonable relationship to compensatory damages which are awarded. The trial court followed the Pennsylvania Suggested Standard Civil Jury Instructions and charged the jury that no reasonable relationship was necessary. On appeal, the Superior *99Court reversed, 357 Pa.Super. 322, 516 A.2d 1, relying in part upon our recent plurality opinion in Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp., 508 Pa. 154, 494 A.2d 1088 (1985). Because of the confusion that has arisen due to conflicting decisions…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Hilbert v. RothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hughes v. BabcockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Rhoads v. HeberlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Donaldson v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Waye v. First Citizen's National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.