Legal Opinion

Robert Golden, Attorney-In-Fact for Leah Golden Donald Earwood, of the Estate of Helen Earwood v. David S. Golden Darlene Koposko

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 3, 2004No. 03-2184PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHERTOFF, Circuit Judge.

Robert Golden, attorney-in-fact for Leah Golden, and Donald Earwood, executor of the estate of Helen Earwood, appeal a final order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissing their action for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants’ action sought, through various means, to challenge the distribution of assets from the estate of Irene I. King. In addition to asserting a number of familiar torts, including fraud and slander, the complaint asserted several grounds for relief that relate to probate law, including…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. McCann v. Newman Irrevocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Charvat v. NMP, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. Morgan v. GayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API