Ingalls v. Neidlinger
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
The questions raised by this appeal are directed to the correctness of the trial court’s rulings on matters of pleading, i. e., the striking of parts of defendants’ answers and cross complaints, which rulings are entwined with the primary problem of the correctness of granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against both defendants.
This action was instituted by Earl W. Neidlinger, as plaintiff (appellee) against A. G. Ingalls and E. A. Moore, defendants (appellants). Since the institution of this appeal, E. A. Moore has died and upon stipulation and by order of court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Coleman v. Crescent Insulated Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Kline v. KlineArizona Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. GutkinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.