Legal Opinion

Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. Green

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1954No. 32762PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether or not a corporation can do business under an assumed name in the state of Washington. The trial court answered the question in the affirmative, and entered judgment for the recovery of a preferential payment received by defendants from an insolvent corporation. Defendants have appealed.

They assert that certain findings of fact made by the trial court are erroneous. The rule is 'that, if they are to prevail on these claims of error, they must show that the evidence preponderates against the questioned findings. MacKenzie-Richardson, Inc., v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foss v. CulbertsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bacon v. GardnerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Colorado Milling & Elevator Co. v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brotherhood State Bank v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. MacKenzie-Richardson, Inc. v. AllertWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co. v. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pro Edge, L.P. v. GueDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  4. LeMaine v. SealsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Crown Controls, Inc. v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API