Legal Opinion
Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co. v. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1967No. 38712PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc., is a California corporation operating as an insurance broker in California; Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Company, a Washington corporation, using the firm name of Farwest General Agency, is also an insurance broker, but principally in Washington. Insurance brokers procure insurance for their customers.
In 1962, Bayly, Martin & Fay requested Farwest to obtain insurance for Cisco Aircraft, Inc., a customer negotiating for a crop-dusting and forest insecticide spraying contract. Farwest, through its London broker, Heath & Company, obtained the insurance from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Tyee Construction Co. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Golden Gate Hop Ranch, Inc. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Nixon v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Avdel Corporation v. MecureSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Callahan v. Keystone Fireworks Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Lewis v. BoursWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Failla v. FixtureOne Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.