Legal Opinion
Glover v. Vail Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 19, 1997No. Civil Action 96-B-394PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Michelle Glover (Glover), asserts various claims for negligence against defendants (collectively, Vail) resulting from a skiing accident. Vail moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the following reasons, I will grant Vail’s motion.
I
The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed most favorably to Glover. At approximately 2:00 p.m. on February 23, 1994, Phillip Glasser (Glasser), while skiing down the “Born Free” ski run at Vail, collided with Glover. As a result of the collision, Glasser was killed, and Glover…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rutherford v. Talisker Canyons Fin., Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
- Gifford v. Vail Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Glover v. Vail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. BodenhausenDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Glover v. Vail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.