Legal Opinion

Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1982No. 80-419PublishedCited by 521 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*335Justice Stevens

delivered the opinion of the Court.. The question presented is whether § 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1, has been violated by agreements among competing physicians setting, by majority vote, the maximum fees that they may claim in full *336payment for health services provided to policyholders of specified insurance plans. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the question could not be answered without evaluating the actual purpose and effect of the agreements at a full trial. 643 F. 2d 553 (1980). Because the undisputed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by521 opinions

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

516 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API