Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Talisker Canyons Fin., Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2019No. Case No. 20140917PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 Young Levi Rutherford crashed and was injured when he skied into a patch of thick, wet, machine-made snow. His parents brought claims for negligence and premises liability on his behalf against Talisker Canyons Finance Company and ASC Utah (collectively, Talisker). Talisker asks us to hold that the Rutherfords' claims are barred by (1) a release of liability signed by Levi's father or, alternatively, (2) Utah's Inherent Risks of Skiing Act, Utah Code sections 78B-4-401 to -404 (the Act). We decline Talisker's invitations.

¶2 Two of our…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Burton v. ChenUtah Supreme Court · 2023
  2. State v. RandolphUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  3. In re G.D...Utah Supreme Court · 2021
  4. State v. Torres-OrellanaUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Christiansen v. Harrison WesternUtah Supreme Court · 2021

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API