Legal Opinion

Webber v. County of Clackamas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 17, 1979No. 77-11-319, CA 11947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Plaintiffs initiated this declaratory judgment proceeding to obtain a declaration that they have established a nonconforming use giving them a vested right to develop their land at a density prohibited by the present Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. The trial court found that plaintiffs had established the nonconforming use, and defendants appeal. We review de novo 1 and reverse.

Plaintiffs own approximately 127 acres of land in Clackamas County. Prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1974, plaintiffs drilled a well on their property, installed a pump, constructed a large…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Eklund v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Clackamas County v. Portland City TempleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. Lindsey v. Dairyland InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Cook v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Milcrest Corp. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. FOPPO v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Campbell v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API