Legal Opinion

Milcrest Corp. v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 1982No. 79-11-41, CA A22184PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

This is a declaratory judgment action in which defendants 1 appeal from the trial court’s decree that plaintiff has a vested right to proceed with a 660-acre planned unit development (PUD). The PUD was approved by Clackamas County before the county adopted its comprehensive plan and does not conform with the plan. We modify the trial court’s decree and affirm it as modified. 2

In January, 1969, the county planning commission approved plaintiffs application for a PUD on a 440-acre site owned by plaintiff. The project was to include approx-' imately 1000 living units, a dam, a lake, a nine-hole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Eklund v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Webber v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mark v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. McKee Family I, LLC v. City of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Or. Shores Conservation Coal. v. Bd. of Commissioners of Clatsop Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. Union Oil Co. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Fountain Village Development Co. v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API