Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 13, 1949No. 33388PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, James R. Hill, against the defendants Robert E. Hill and Alma F. Hill on July 6, 1942, to declare a deed conveying 40 acres of land in Kingfisher county to Robert E. Hill, and a conveyance of 160 acres of school land in said county, held by plaintiff under a contract of purchase, *484to the same grantee, mortgages or conveyances as security only. The conveyances were absolute in form and were executed on December 30, 1931, and January 8, 1932, respectively. The alleged agreement between plaintiff and Robert E. Hill that they were given as security was oral.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Noble v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Byrd v. McKoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Holly v. HollySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Hafer v. LemonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Lieuallen v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Rockett v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Little v. EcholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Billingslea v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API